On 3/31/2012 4:35 PM, c. wrote: > > On 30 Mar 2012, at 17:53, marco atzeri wrote: > >> Carlo >> the package has a strange structure >> >> secs1d-0.0.9 >> secs1d-0.0.9/bak >> secs1d-0.0.9/bak/DDG >> secs1d-0.0.9/bak/DDN >> secs1d-0.0.9/bak/src >> secs1d-0.0.9/bak/Utilities >> secs1d-0.0.9/doc >> secs1d-0.0.9/doc/function >> secs1d-0.0.9/doc/function/images >> secs1d-0.0.9/inst >> >> >> the bak looks puzzling >> >> Marco > > that's the old functions in case someone needs them they won't get > automaically > added to the path so most people won't even notice their presence. > > c.
I noticed. secs1d-0.0.9 demos are very nice. With the rewriting and the documentation, you should have named it at least secs1d-0.1.0 ;-) Waiting for secs2d and secs3d update. Regards Marco ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
