On 11 April 2012 16:24, Carnë Draug <carandraug+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 April 2012 12:55, Martin Helm <mar...@mhelm.de> wrote:
>> Am 06.04.2012 22:47, schrieb Alexander Görtz:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm new at this list, so first hello to everyone and keep up the good
>>> work.
>>>
>>> But now to my 'problem'. I'm using the im2double function for some
>>> grayscale
>>> images which worked fine until I came across a 1bit black and white image.
>>> I
>>> got the error that the input of im2double must be an image, which doesn't
>>> make
>>> that much sens as the input actually is an image. So I would suggest to
>>> change
>>> the error message that the input hast to be a 8, 16 uint or a double
>>> image.
>>> Or even better make im2double work with class(img) = logical what should
>>> be
>>> fairly easy as the only thing you need to return is double(img) as the
>>> image
>>> already is in the range [0, 1].
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Alexander
>>>
>> Can you try the attached one? If it works as expected I will send a patch
>> for the svn sources.
>
> I have made some further changes to im2double to add support for
> indexed images. Also increased matlab compatibility and now accepts
> input of double precision (returns the same) instead of an error.

I have expanded the changes to the others im2"class" functions and
added 2 simple implementations of new ones (im2single and im2int16).

Carnë

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to