Am 14.02.2012 um 17:09 schrieb Carnë Draug: > On 14 February 2012 15:55, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jord...@octave.org> wrote: >> I still think that using reject and select instead >> of logical indexing is strange for Octave. > > Maybe a note can be added to the help text of this functions later > explaining that this functions allow for ease of read/write for users > that are familiar with smalltalk but that logical indexing is a more > octavish approach that may have better performace?
Hi, while browsing the "miscellaneous" package, I noticed that what I tried to achieve the Smalltalk way had been done before in LISP (Python?) style with the functions apply, match, map, and reduce. Apply has been deprecated already, but given logical indexing and the presence of accumarray and structfun I think that similar arguments can be brought up against match, map and reduce, or do I miss something here? Alex -- Dr. Alexander Klein, Diplom-Mathematiker Physiologisches Institut der JLU-Gießen Aulweg 129 35392 Gießen http://www.med.uni-giessen.de/physio/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
