On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Carnë Draug <carandraug+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 May 2012 17:08, marco atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> image requires signal but signal requires image
>>
>> main/image/DESCRIPTION:Depends: signal
>> main/signal/DESCRIPTION:Depends: optim (>= 1.0.0), specfun, control (>=
>> 2.2.3), image
>>
>> I was updating the forge packages for 3.6.x and I am in
>> "chicken and egg" situation so I can not install any on my
>> build as I need to build/install in sequence.
>>
>> Can we drop the "image requires signal" or "signal requires image" ?
>> How ?
>
> To drop the image requires signal, just remove the normxcorr2 from the
> image package. This function is not very compatible with matlab yet
> and "normxcorr2 (a, b)" is just "xcorr2 (b, a, "coeff")"

IIRC isn't interp also a dependency of image on signal?  I don't have
the code in front of me at the moment but I think I saw that
somewhere.

Fewer interdependencies makes everything easier to maintain.  If we
can make both independent of each other, all the better.

If we had to keep one, conceptually it makes more sense to me to say
"image requires signal" than "signal requires image".  To me as a DSP
person, image is just a higher dimensional signal.

I think it's easier to address "signal requires image" by revisiting
replacing padarray.  I didn't want to change it at the time because
I'm relatively new here and I try to not change what's been working.
Now it seems this is not working :)

-- 
mike

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to