On 15 August 2012 15:22, Mike Miller <mtmil...@ieee.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 14 August 2012 20:59, Carnë Draug <carandraug+...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 14 August 2012 20:02, Mike Miller <mtmil...@ieee.org> wrote: >>>> Have you done any comparison of the actual resulting filter against >>>> what Matlab returns? >>> >>> Nop. This matlab it's not on my system, and the one where it is >>> doesn't have Octave, so it's a bit of a bum to go around with saved >>> files between the two. >> >> Ok. So I did this and they do look a bit different. They are definitely not >> equal but I wouldn't know how to fix it anyway. I have attached the matlab >> results if you'd like to have better look. The name of the variable relates >> to the arguments used, for example, b63_500 is "fir2 (63, f, m, 500)" while >> b63_def is "fir2 (63, f, m)" (def for default). > > Ok, thanks for the data, I'll look at it but probably not for another > week or so.
Just for curiosity, I ported our fir2 to matlab to see how it behaves there (maybe the difference was due to incompatibility with some other function being used by fir2) and I saw the same differences when I ran it there. Carnë ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
