On 3 Sep 2012, at 20:04, Thomas Weber wrote: > Okay, it seems that I indeed don't understand something here. I thought > that Rafael just meant the executable bit. Rafael, what are the > permissions you are talking about? Apart from the executable bit, the > permissions in the tarball are 644 after unpacking, which seems > appropriate.
In my local copy some of the files listed by Raphael had mode 640, is this not the case in the tarball? > Thomas c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
