On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:11:37PM +0200, davide prandi wrote:
> 
> Thanks to everyone.I had already tried to change the variable's
> order with '@', but the method solves a SYSTEM of differential
> equations. I give you an example:
> [T,Y]=ode23s(@fun, [0 5], [1 2 3]);
> where 'fun' is a vector of equations:
> function 
> Fv=fun(Y,t)Fv(1,1)=2*Y(1)+Y(2)+5*Y(3)+exp(-2*t);Fv(2,1)=-3*Y(1)-2*Y(2)-8*Y(3)+2*exp(-2*t)-cos(3*t);Fv(3,1)=3*Y(1)+3*Y(2)+2*Y(3)+cos(3*t);
> 
> The problem is: all of ode solvers take in input function in
> fun(t,Y) form. dfxpdp computes jacobian matrix with function in
> fun(Y,t) form.Obviously fun(t,Y) is user-defined, and I've to find a
> way to convert fun(t,Y) in fun(Y,t) form. When this problem is
> fixed, I can upload the .m file.  Thanks, Davide

I thought my previous post would show you how to solve just this
problem. It does not matter whether your method solves a system of
equations as above or only one.

Olaf

-- 
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to