On 09/08/2012 05:39 PM, Claudio Freire wrote: > A heads up: I don't use queueing. But I'm packaging it, meaning I > build it and run its tests. > > I was updating from queueing-1.0.0 to queueing-1.1.0, and a lot of > failing tests just appeared. > > I'm attaching a log. > > Most tests seem to fail due to numerical imprecision, though in some > cases the error is quite big.
Thanks for your report. The cases where the error is big are known failures (in fact those blocks are marked with #!xtest, there are three of them). For the others I will increase the tolerance since they are due to numerical inaccuracy. I will release a new version of queueing shortly. Moreno. -- Moreno Marzolla EMail: mor...@moreno.marzolla.name WWW : http://www.moreno.marzolla.name/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
