On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <step...@missouri.edu> wrote: > On 09/23/2012 05:20 PM, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Paul Dreik <sl...@pauldreik.se> wrote: >>> >>> >>> 2012-09-23 22:33, Claudio Freire skrev: >>>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:06 PM, c. <carlo.defa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I'm in. >>>>> >>>>> We should have the description of the required improvements at >>>>> >>>>> http://wiki.octave.org/Projects#Packaging >>>>> >>>>> a bit more specific before the sprint. >>>> >>>> I just added: >>>> make pkg able to supply extra configure and make flags, useful for >>>> distributions, including -j for make >>> Just curios, are there any octave packages that benefit from parallel >>> compilation? >>> paul >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. >>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics >>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: >>>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? >>>> http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Octave-dev mailing list >>>> Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. >>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics >>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: >>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? >>> http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Octave-dev mailing list >>> Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev >> >> I do not understand the question and it seem off-topic. Can you open >> another thread to discuss that? > > The question made sense to me, and wasn't off topic. One person said it > would be nice if "-j" could be passed to make via pkg.m. Another person > asked if there would be any advantage to doing this (since "-j" causes > make to do parallel builds). Filling in the blanks, I assume he meant > that most packages build so fast that passing "-j" would be of very > little benefit. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? > http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html > _______________________________________________ > Octave-dev mailing list > Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
oh! sorry then for my miss interpretation. Being able to pass "-j" to pkg would be perfect! @Paul: Sorry! If that was your question. Definitely, control for example would compile much faster if we can use multiple processors/cores. -- M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal ----- PhD Student University of Zürich http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
