On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:11 AM, c. <carlo.defa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10 Oct 2012, at 09:16, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
>
> >> I propose fixing this test by replacing the tolerance eps with something
> >> like 2*eps*norm(z)
>
> FYI this could be expressed as
>
> 2 * eps (z)
>
> from the help text for eps () :
>
> "Given a single argument X, return the distance between X and the next
> largest value"
>
> c.
Thanks, Carlos, I wasn't aware of this capability. I thought it was just
what I needed until I
tried it on a vector, expecting something like eps(z) = eps*norm(z) but
what I get is eps(z(1)).
Is that the intended behavior?
--
Ed Meyer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
