Hi Paul I'm Carnë Draug, the current maintainer of the Octave Forge. You have released all of your code under GPL+ or public domain with the exception of medfilt1 on the signal package.
https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/11396/tree/trunk/octave-forge/main/signal/src/medfilt1.cc Your license text reads: Copyright 2000 Paul Kienzle <pkien...@users.sf.net> This source code is freely redistributable and may be used for any purpose. This copyright notice must be maintained. Paul Kienzle is not responsible for the consequences of using this software. However, we decided to drop usage of non-standard licenses. Could you please use a more standard one? Being able to give it a recognisable name not only eases our organisation but also its acceptance by downstream package maintainers such as Debian. From Debian's upstream guide "Please do not write your own license text if you can at all avoid it. Depending on your wishes, the GPL, LGPL or a BSD-style license will most likely be appropriate, and it is far easier to tell whether something is allowed if we can look at past discussions of the same text. " I'm sorry to bother with such non-scientific things. I'm not a lawyer myself, but unfortunately things like this need to be made clear. Please just let me know which one you prefer and I'll take care of everything else. Thanks in advance, Carnë Draug ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management. Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
