On 11/20/2012 07:43 PM, Nir Krakauer wrote: > Can the contributed functions be given names that don't conflict with > the current Octave ones, like erf_complex? That way there should be no > problem with putting them either in specfun or as their own Octave > package.
That's an alternative. Yet it might be desired to have complex error function family of functions: octave-cli:3> erfc(complex(1,pi)) error: erfc: not defined for complex scalar Will this code work for that? If Steven's code were released as a mini C library that could be accessed easily and had some compile switches to use internal square root, sinc, etc. functions or external, that might address Jordi's concern about maintaining the code. Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
