On 17 January 2011 20:33, Mike Linksvayer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Rufus Pollock <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On 17 January 2011 19:08, Daniel Dietrich <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> [...] >> >> 1) Is there a german translation for the ODC-BY? >> >> 2) I don't understand why on this site >> >> http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/summary/ >> >> the attribution points to the ODbL? I thought they were two >> >> (completely) different licenses? Or is it a mistake? >> >> The sentence is "You must attribute any public use of the database, or >> >> works produced from the database, in the manner specified in the ODbL. >> > >> > Regarding these questions I hope that someone else on this list can >> > answer it better than me. >> >> This is a typo and has been corrected. Apologies for any confusion. > > Similarly, there's still a reference to ODbL near the top of > http://www.opendatacommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/odc_by_1.0_public_text.txt
Good spot (as it was originally!). This is now fixed. Many thanks again for the spot and the report. > Pointed out in > http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/2010-June/007309.html Sorry this got missed -- somehow the other item got fixed but not this! > I think other bugs mentioned there taken care of, but I haven't looked > closely in some time. Yes I believe they have. Regards, Rufus _______________________________________________ odc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/odc-discuss
