Dear ODC members, I was about to use ODC-BY-1.0 for our open data collection in https://github.com/soluvas/opendata, but noticed that ODC-BY-1.0 is not listed in https://spdx.org/licenses/
For a license released in 2010 and recommended by http://opendefinition.org/licenses/, this seems a peculiarity. Also, I have never met an open data licensed as ODC-BY so far. CC-BY is the most popular, and also sometimes ODbL. ODC-BY seems to be very similar to CC-BY. So now I wonder, is CC-BY more recommended over ODC-BY? Is there a reason why CC-BY is still widely used despite existence of ODC-BY? I have a bit of concern that when I'm using ODC-BY, some people will ask "what's that?" Compared to when they see CC-BY it's something they already know. Thank you. Hendy Irawan
_______________________________________________ odc-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/odc-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/odc-discuss
