Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ode Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by AlexBoisvert:
http://wiki.apache.org/ode/RoadMap

New page:
Here's the first list of objectives (aka roadmap) identified on the developer 
mailing list:

  * We would like to set on a common implementation as a matter of economy of 
scale.

  * There is a desire to remove the current PXE dependency on Hibernate, which 
is licensed under the LGPL.  The abstraction layer developed for BPE could be 
useful for a common Ode implementation. The BPE implementation relies on J2EE 
CMP for stateful persistence. Stateless usage scenarios do not require 
persistence.  EJB3 might be a suitable candidate for state persistence where 
needed.

  * A data abstraction layer developed for the BPE could be useful for 
isolating the BPEL engine from a specific content model.  This probably has 
implications to the entry point API mentioned above. There is an existing ODE 
thread of discussion on the topic.

  * Two deployment models will be supported, one through pre-compilation at 
design time (model currently supported by PXE), and the other through 
pre-compilation at deployment time (model currently supported by BPE).  The 
prior scenario is useful for tools that rely on early error detection specific 
to BPEL and the latter is useful when BPEL is not the originating language.

  * The common Ode implementation should support BPEL 2.0 within the 
constraints of the WS-BPEL 2.0 specification timeframe.

  * We will support optimizations for stateless business processes within the 
implementation

  * We desire to supply run-time engine debugging support that is capable of 
referring back to the originating BPEL markup for purposes of tooling support

  * The management interfaces represented in the PXE implementation are 
compelling

  * The Jacob engine is interesting in itself because it appears to be 
analogous to the focused approach taken in BPE of walking the object model.  We 
need to examine this further and consider the thread and container isolation 
issues.

  * We need to determine the most capable and useful entry point API for any 
common Ode implementation.  It's probably productive to avoid introducing any 
external dependencies to any bus architecture or external protocols so that the 
core engine can be used by as many external projects as possible while avoiding 
unnecessary dependencies. This implies that the proprietary JBI-like bus 
currently used by the PXE contribution would need to be abandoned.

  * The implementation should support both a transactionally contiguous 
invoke-to-endpoint transaction model as well as an asynchronous coupling 
(callback-enable implementation) to the endpoint from the engine (the latter 
requirement is specific to current PXE usage scenarios).  The transactional 
requirements imply some isolation of the thread semantics, currently present in 
the PXE contribution, would be necessary.

  * Testing

    a) Unit test suites can be contributed for BPEL 1.1 and BPEL 2.0 initially 
based on the PXE and BPE contributions and the final set will be derived from 
the intersection of the two test suite contributions.

    b) A benchmarking framework should be created to assess typical messaging 
scenarios and stress tests

Reply via email to