On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > So the AODL .Net module is not part of the contribution to Apache? > > Is it under the ALv2 at the ODF Toolkit Union? >
Yes, it is under ALv2, but the person who was maintaining it is no longer interested and declined the offer to move to Apache. I did copy their dev and user lists on all the Apache proposal discussions, but no interest. There is a fork of that module that lives on at BitBucket, but even that appears to have been abandoned (no changes since 2009): https://bitbucket.org/chrisc/aodl If you have a strong interest in that component, speak up. We don't want unnecessary work for converting the website, doing IP review, etc., for code that no one is interested in developing further. But if someone is interested in this module, then we should discuss. Unfortunately I know very little about it. -Rob > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 06:49 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: List of code base needed to convert from Mercurial to SVN > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Devin Han <[email protected]> wrote: > [ ... ] > >> 5.AODL - the .Net module of the ODFToolkit (Revision 13): >> https://hg.odftoolkit.org/hg/aodl~developer >> > > We are not bringing the C#/.NET AODL component to Apache. [ ... ] > >
