Just fixed the mistake links and added the link of ODF Toolkit Union releases.
2012/1/14 Rob Weir <[email protected]> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Devin Han <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Rob let the remaining work clear. > >> The approved packages can be access here: > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/ > >> I am working on fix the existing issue on the configuration of pom.xml > and > >> it should be ready before next week. > >> > >> we also need a download page following this guide: > >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html. Anyone > volunteer to > >> help us do this job? > >> > > > > The Rave podling download page looks like it follows those instructions: > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/rave/downloads.html > > > > It is also mdtext-based, so it will work well with our existing website. > > > > I'll work on that today. > > > > OK. Here it is: http://incubator.apache.org/odftoolkit/downloads.html > > It appears to work. The release downloads go to the mirrors, the > detached hash requests go to Apache. I added the suggested language > asking downloaders to verify the hashes. > > >> 2012/1/12 Rob Weir <[email protected]> > >> > >>> So now that we have an approved released, what should we do? > >>> > >>> 1) I assume that Devin, as Release Manager, is working on getting the > >>> approved packages onto the mirrors and Maven central. > >>> > >>> 2) We will want a link from our website as well, probably a top level > >>> "Download" link > >>> > >>> 3) An announcement email that we can send to the odf-users and related > >>> lists. > >>> > >>> 4) Do what we can do individually to promote awareness of this new > >>> release, via social networking sites, etc. > >>> > >>> 5) Start discussion on the next release. > >>> > >>> In general, I think this initial release at Apache is a great > >>> opportunity to make people more aware of our work, attract more users, > >>> and hopefully more contributors as well. The work we've done in this > >>> initial release was not very fun. We did a lot of migration, of > >>> websites and code, a lot of work to review IP, a lot of work to create > >>> Maven assemblies and comply with Apache release procedures. These > >>> were all one-time tasks, and future releases should be a lot easier. > >>> > >>> But now begins the fun part, talking about new features and writing > >>> new code. This will be a good opportunity to attract new developers. > >>> I think we all agree that increasing the size and diversity of the > >>> project is important. (We say this in our podling report, for > >>> example). So let's think about how we can grow the community. > >>> > >>> -Rob > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> -Devin > -- -Devin
