Hi all, Oliver is the last person modifying the pom.xml for fixing the wrong version number. @Svante pls clean up or remove your local repository and try again.
2012/3/1 Svante Schubert <[email protected]> > On 29.02.2012 23:17, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Svante Schubert > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 25.02.2012 13:38, Nick Burch wrote: > >>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Svante Schubert wrote: > >>>> I would suggest to do it similar here. Has anybody further > >>>> information on the issue below. Again the apache-rat-plugin triggered > >>>> the failure. Similar as in my local build yesterday, but on a > >>>> different project. > >>> The problem is that someone has added new files, but neglected to add > >>> the Apache license header to them: > >>> > >>>>> mavenExecutionResult exceptions not empty > >>>>> message : Failed to execute goal > >>>>> org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.7:check (default) on project > >>>>> odfdom-java: Too many unapproved licenses: 2 > >>>>> cause : Too many unapproved licenses: 2 > >>>>> Stack trace : > >>>>> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to > >>>>> execute goal org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.7:check (default) on > >>>>> project odfdom-java: Too many unapproved licenses: 2 > >>> The license headers should ideally be added by the person who added > >>> the file. Could whoever has added new files to svn recently please > >>> double check that the headers are there, and add them if not? > >>> > >>> (To check, run "mvn rat:check" then look for rat.txt files which > >>> report the state) > >>> > >> I just had again a build problems due to RAT failure (on Windows7), but > >> I am pretty sure this is not Devin's failure! > >> The last nightly build worked fine: > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/ODFToolkit/28/ > >> > >> Still in trunk\generator\schema2template\target\rat.txt > >> There is a problem of a binary ODF document: > >> 1 Unknown Licenses > >> ******************************* > >> Unapproved licenses: > >> > >> > E:/work/coding/odftoolkit-20120229/trunk/generator/schema2template/src/main/resources/examples/odf/odfdom-python/OdfTextDocument.odt > >> ... > >> !????? > >> > E:/work/coding/odftoolkit-20120229/trunk/generator/schema2template/src/main/resources/examples/odf/odfdom-python/OdfTextDocument.odt > >> > >> This document is part of the initial start-up, the "svn log" shows: > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> r1167953 | devin | 2011-08-26 08:21:29 +0200 (Fr, 26 Aug 2011) | 4 lines > >> > >> changeset: 0:6440405b3f8c > >> user: Svante Schubert <[email protected]> > >> date: Mon Jan 11 22:05:39 2010 +0100 > >> Initial sources to share the maven challenges to master.. > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> What is wrong with RAT? > >> > > RAT hasn't changed, but the pom has. > > > > See Revision: 1244419 > > Author: devinhan > > Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:43:09 AM > > Message: > > #ODFTOOLKIT-199# Supply signature and manifest features to code > > generator plugin.[Developer:Devin] > > > > There was an exclusion for that ODF file earlier. The exclusion was > > removed. I don't know why. > > > Strange, I could not find any configuration options for the rat plugin > to declare ODF files as binaries (see > http://incubator.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/usage.html) > If this is the reason for the failure, how could the nightly build two > days ago pass? > Anyway, as long the only vantage in having only one committer is you > always know the culprit. > I will change this tomorrow adding the JDK7 patch, but I will not commit > into a red master. > > Thanks, > Svante > > > > -- -Devin
