Hi Svante,
2013/2/28 Svante Schubert <[email protected]> > I have tested a few things, one needs further attention: > > 1. It build well under W7 with pedantic and showed no exceptions during > test runs: > mvn install -Ppedantic > ..\odftoolkit-06-rc2.log > 2. The validator works fine! > I have deployed the > 0.6-incubating-rc2\validator\target\odfvalidator-1.1.6-incubating.war > in > a Tomcat7. > 3. The taglets are okay, the JavaDoc of the generated DOM nodes are > referencing to the correct ODF specification. > 4. Only the documentation needs further fix, see blow: > > If you take a look into > 0.6-incubating-rc2/simple/target/apidocs/index.html > > > Further Information > > For further Information about Simple Java API for ODF and related topics > please visit following pages: > > 1. Simple Java API for ODF wiki > <http://odftoolkit.org/projects/simple/pages/Home> > 2. Simple Java API for ODF website <http://simple.odftoolkit.org> > 3. ODF 1.2 Specification - ODF XML Schema (part1 - community draft 5) > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/OpenDocument-v1.2-part1.html> > 4. ODF 1.2 Specification - ODF XML Schema (part1 - latest published > version) > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/OpenDocument-v1.2-part1.html> > 5. ODF 1.2 Specification - ODF Package (part3 - latest published > version) > <http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/OpenDocument-v1.2-part3.html> > 6. ODFDOM wiki <http://odftoolkit.org/projects/odfdom/pages/Home> > > > 1, 2, 6 are broken and 3-5 reference to the latest spec, but the text is > wrong. I suggest to drop 4 and remove from 3 & 4 the additions after > part1 & part3. > > Thanks your feedback, Kejia Have fix the one and I commit it. Similar problem for "Further Information" of > 0.6-incubating-rc2/odfdom/target/apidocs/index.html > If you need assistance let me know, but I believe it is best, when I do > not commit anything at this stage. > > Thanks for the release! (After that fix +1) > Svante > > On 28.02.2013 08:40, Dali Liu wrote: > > We make some great features and fix some bugs in last year, so I think we > > need this release. > > So I am +1 > > > > 2013/2/28 Rob Weir <[email protected]> > > > > This is a [VOTE][DISCUSS] thread for any parallel discussion related > >> to the RC and the vote. > >> > >
