@Svante,

Thanks for the offer.  I must decline.

I have no competence with Maven and won't be changing that any time soon.  

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Svante Schubert [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] odftoolkit.org [Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF 
Toolkit 0.6-incubating-RC6]

If I remember it well, it had something to do with tool chain or just
someone who thought it was a good idea at that time (not me this time)!
Does not hurt me, but should not be a problem to exchange it in the root
maven pom.xml [1], would you like to give it a try, Dennis?

[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4947215/maven-3-generate-javadoc-for-defined-artifacts

Best regards,
Svante

On 30.05.2013 20:17, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> This is not a [VOTE] [;<).
>
> I am simply curious why the convenience provision of the JavaDoc collections 
> in odftoolkit-0.6-incubating-doc.zip uses .jar packages rather than .zip 
> archives.  (The only reason I can find for it is the meta-inf\ usage, though 
> I'm not sure all of that is applicable to the JavaDoc sets anyhow.)
>
> I also note that the README.txt is about the overall release and not 
> specifically about -doc.zip.
>
>  - Dennis
>

Reply via email to