[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODFTOOLKIT-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

william updated ODFTOOLKIT-392:
-------------------------------

    Description: 
1. Define ods file, setup cell content, comment.
2. Try with API cell.getDisplayText() or cell.getStringText(), sometimes it 
returns as format "2014-08-13T00:00:00\n{comment}\n{cell content}", but 
sometimes it returns as format "{cell 
content}\n{comment}\n2014-08-13T00:00:00". 
3. I just want to get the cell content value, if don't setup comment, it's 
returns the same value everytime, otherwise, the Time/Comment/Content is 
ruleless.


   
 

  was:
1. Define ods file, setup cell content, comment.
2. Try with API cell.getDisplayText()/cell.getStringText(), sometimes it 
returns as format 
"2014-08-13T00:00:00\n{comment}\n{cell content}", but sometimes it returns as 
format
"{cell content}\n{comment}\n2014-08-13T00:00:00". 
3. I just want to get the cell content value, if don't setup comment, it's 
returns the same value everytime, otherwise, the Time/Comment/Content is 
ruleless.


   
 


> cell content is not uniform if contains comment
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ODFTOOLKIT-392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODFTOOLKIT-392
>             Project: ODF Toolkit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: odfdom
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.1-incubating
>         Environment: Linux, Redhat5
>            Reporter: william
>
> 1. Define ods file, setup cell content, comment.
> 2. Try with API cell.getDisplayText() or cell.getStringText(), sometimes it 
> returns as format "2014-08-13T00:00:00\n{comment}\n{cell content}", but 
> sometimes it returns as format "{cell 
> content}\n{comment}\n2014-08-13T00:00:00". 
> 3. I just want to get the cell content value, if don't setup comment, it's 
> returns the same value everytime, otherwise, the Time/Comment/Content is 
> ruleless.
>    
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to