[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODFTOOLKIT-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Cailloux updated ODFTOOLKIT-464:
----------------------------------------
Description:
When depending on Apache ODFToolkit simple-odf in my application
(org.apache.odftoolkit:simple-odf:0.8.2-incubating), I observe that
com.sun:tools is transitively imposed on my project as a dependency (coming
from taglets, see its
[POM|https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/odftoolkit/taglets/0.8.11-incubating/taglets-0.8.11-incubating.pom],
coming from
[odfdom-java|http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.apache.odftoolkit%22%20AND%20a%3A%22odfdom-java%22]).
Similarly, org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12 is passed to my project as a dependency.
I suspect these dependencies are actually not required for projects depending
on simple-odf.
It is possible and simple to ease the life of users of simple-odf by adding
<optional> in the relevant pom files. This would respect Maven best practices.
(See for example
[SO|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32231814/how-can-i-remove-logback-from-a-librarys-dependency-while-keeping-slf4j].)
Workaround: add exclusion rules for these artifacts (see this example
[POM|https://github.com/oliviercailloux/Test-ODFToolkit-ODS/blob/master/pom.xml]).
(I tried to discuss it
[here|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6fa4257e67ede90bac58f5518e1be41e7561a451149cbc9eecdbbf1e@%3Codf-users.incubator.apache.org%3E]
but received no answer.)
was:
When depending on Apache ODFToolkit simple-odf in my application
(org.apache.odftoolkit:simple-odf:0.8.2-incubating), I observe that
com.sun:tools is transitively imposed on my project as a dependency (coming
from taglets, see its
[POM|https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/odftoolkit/taglets/0.8.11-incubating/taglets-0.8.11-incubating.pom]).
Similarly, org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12 is passed to my project as a dependency.
I suspect these dependencies are actually not required for projects depending
on simple-odf.
It is possible and simple to ease the life of users of simple-odf by adding
<optional> in the relevant pom files. This would respect Maven best practices.
(See for example
[SO|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32231814/how-can-i-remove-logback-from-a-librarys-dependency-while-keeping-slf4j].)
Workaround: add exclusion rules for these artifacts (see this example
[POM|https://github.com/oliviercailloux/Test-ODFToolkit-ODS/blob/master/pom.xml]).
(I tried to discuss it
[here|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6fa4257e67ede90bac58f5518e1be41e7561a451149cbc9eecdbbf1e@%3Codf-users.incubator.apache.org%3E]
but received no answer.)
> Pom does not follow best practices: missing optional keyword
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ODFTOOLKIT-464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODFTOOLKIT-464
> Project: ODF Toolkit
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: simple api
> Reporter: Olivier Cailloux
> Priority: Minor
>
> When depending on Apache ODFToolkit simple-odf in my application
> (org.apache.odftoolkit:simple-odf:0.8.2-incubating), I observe that
> com.sun:tools is transitively imposed on my project as a dependency (coming
> from taglets, see its
> [POM|https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/odftoolkit/taglets/0.8.11-incubating/taglets-0.8.11-incubating.pom],
> coming from
> [odfdom-java|http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.apache.odftoolkit%22%20AND%20a%3A%22odfdom-java%22]).
> Similarly, org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12 is passed to my project as a dependency.
> I suspect these dependencies are actually not required for projects depending
> on simple-odf.
> It is possible and simple to ease the life of users of simple-odf by adding
> <optional> in the relevant pom files. This would respect Maven best
> practices. (See for example
> [SO|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32231814/how-can-i-remove-logback-from-a-librarys-dependency-while-keeping-slf4j].)
> Workaround: add exclusion rules for these artifacts (see this example
> [POM|https://github.com/oliviercailloux/Test-ODFToolkit-ODS/blob/master/pom.xml]).
> (I tried to discuss it
> [here|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6fa4257e67ede90bac58f5518e1be41e7561a451149cbc9eecdbbf1e@%3Codf-users.incubator.apache.org%3E]
> but received no answer.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
