Hello Georg,
create a JIRA issue for what you are improving for the Simple API (use this
as the component) and attach two patches to the JIRA issue.
One patch for the tests, which would fail without your other patch
providing the implementation.
The patches might be GIT or Subversion, I would prefer GIT, as I would
merge them as soon our repository was transformed from Subversion to GIt.
Thanks in advance for the patches!
Svante
ᐧ
2018-04-16 14:51 GMT+02:00 DevNews <devn...@safir-wid.de>:
> Hallo Svante,
>
> me, too, just came back from a vacation!
> Before my vacation I implemented these list-decorators as desribed below.
> Now I planned to implement some unit-tests and then suppose these changes
> to be imported to the project.
>
> The changes would be the following new classes:
>
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.NumberDecoratorBase
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.NumberedAlphaLowerDecorator
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.NumberedAlphaUpperDecorator
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.NumberedGreekLowerDecorator
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.NumberedGreekUpperDecorator
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.NumberedRomanLowerDecorator
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.NumberedRomanUpperDecorator
>
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.BulletDecoratorBase
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.SquareDecorator
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.DiscDecorator
>
> And the changes classes ( that behave unchanged)
>
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.BulletDecorator
> - org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.NumberDecorator
>
> What shall I do?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Georg
>
>
>
>
> safir Wirtschaftsinformationsdienst GmbH
> Möllendorffstr. 49
> 10367 Berlin
> Tel.:++49 30 577981 - 0
> Fax: ++49 30 577981 - 18
> E-Mail: i...@safir-wid.de
> Internet: www.safir-wid.de
> Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 66681
> USt-ID: DE 193584747
> Geschäftsführer: Thilo Kind
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Svante Schubert <svante.schub...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. April 2018 18:10
> An: odf-users@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: custom designed ordered and unordered lists
>
> Hello Georg,
>
> Just returned from a vacation and will need to take a deeper look into it.
> From the internal view of some office applications, lists are just
> paragraphs with some additional properties. You pick a paragraph and assign
> some list styles to it.
> I started to work on lists using odf changes, let me see if I am able to
> finish it within the next month.
>
> Cheers,
> Svante
> ᐧ
>
> 2018-03-15 17:51 GMT+01:00 DevNews <devn...@safir-wid.de>:
>
> > Hallo,
> >
> > I try once more to ask my question:
> > I have to create different listings in a dynamic odf document:
> > Like:
> > 1. Xx
> > 2. Xx
> > 3. Xx
> >
> > i. Xx
> > ii. Xx
> > iii. Xx
> >
> > a) xxx
> > b) xxx
> > c) xxx
> >
> > At the moment I only get created ordered Lists like: 1. 2. 3. and
> > unordered Lists like ● ● ●
> >
> >
> > So there is my question:
> >
> > I would like to write new Decorators that implement ListDecorator So I
> > would write a NumberedDecoratorBase. This class should implement a
> > „custom“ numbered ListDecorator that has to be supplied with all
> > configurations. (that is: prefix, suffix, number-symbol, indentation,
> > etc.)
> >
> > Then I would inherit the existing NumberDecorator from this
> > NumberedDecoratorBase.
> > Then I would write additional Decorators that all inherit from this
> > NumberedDecoratorBase like:
> > NumberedAlphaLowerDecorator,
> > NumberedAlphaUpperDecorator,
> > NumberedRomanLowerDecorator,
> > NumberedRomanUpperDecorator,
> > NumberedGreekLowerDecorator,
> >
> > All this decorators would implement the function:
> > public ListType getListType() {
> > return ListType.NUMBER;
> > }
> >
> >
> > The same I would do for BulletDecorator: I would write a
> > SymbolDeoratorBase, inherit BulletDecorator from this
> > SymbolDeoratorBase and then write following new Decorators inheriting
> from SymbolDeoratorBase:
> > DotDecorator
> > SquareDecorator
> >
> > All this decorators would implement the function:
> > public ListType getListType() {
> > return ListType. BULLET;
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > - If I would do so, do I have to consider more?
> > - Is it right to have the same ListType.NUMBER and
> > ListType.BULLET for all my new decorators?
> > - I saw that ListType.NUMBER is used in
> > org.odftoolkit.simple.text.list.List.toString(). I suppose that this
> > function is not used for production but for debugging and I don't have
> > to consider this….
> >
> >
> > Can somebody advice me, if this will be a good way of doing?
> >
> > Thanks Georg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > safir Wirtschaftsinformationsdienst GmbH Möllendorffstr. 49
> > 10367 Berlin
> > Tel.:++49 30 577981 - 0
> > Fax: ++49 30 577981 - 18
> > E-Mail: i...@safir-wid.de<mailto:i...@safir-wid.de>
> > Internet: www.safir-wid.de<http://www.safir-wid.de>
> > Handelsregister:
> > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 66681
> > USt-ID: DE 193584747
> > Geschäftsführer: Thilo Kind
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: Georg Füchsle <g.fuech...@safir-wid.de>
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2018 14:43
> > An: odf-users@incubator.apache.org
> > Betreff: custom designed ordered and unordered lists
> >
> > Hallo,
> >
> > as far as I see, in odfdom I can use only a standard BulletList and a
> > standard NumberedList, that will produce following output.
> > 1. Xx
> > 2. Xx
> > 3. Xx
> >
> > or
> > ● ddd
> > ● hjdh
> > ● hhj
> >
> > Is there the possibility to set the ordering symbol dynamically?
> >
> > Thanks Georg
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > safir Wirtschaftsinformationsdienst GmbH
> > Möllendorffstr. 49
> > 10367 Berlin
> > Tel.:++49 30 577981 - 0
> > Fax: ++49 30 577981 - 18
> > E-Mail: i...@safir-wid.de<mailto:i...@safir-wid.de>
> > Internet: www.safir-wid.de<http://www.safir-wid.de>
> > Handelsregister:
> > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 66681
> > USt-ID: DE 193584747
> > Geschäftsführer: Thilo Kind
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > This email was Malware checked by UTM 9. http://www.sophos.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > This email was Malware checked by UTM 9. http://www.sophos.com
> >
> > --
> > This email was Malware checked by UTM 9. http://www.sophos.com
> >
>
