On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:30 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 19:51 -0700, nigel wrote: > > As well it looks like your using the new bitbake which will not work with > > the > > current oz-fam branch. > > Why not? I was under the impression that the new bitbake was meant to > be backwards compatible with previous releases. Is that not actually > the case?
Not entirely, I'm afraid. Apparently the RDEPENDS inference code is to some extent always active (I haven't managed to take the time to look into the code yet). I talked to Richard about this a while ago and as I understand it there's no quick fix/workaround for it. On a clean build bitbake will spit out a number of error messages due to not being able to read not-yet written files containing kernel version information (unless you apply a patch to base.bbclass that doesn't look right to me). Also, it seems there are cases of the dependency handling not yielding the exact same results as before, but I haven't had the time to check that properly yet. Rene -- Rene Wagner rw at handhelds dot org 4F33 7FD7 93B3 166B BADA D6F8 71A1 FEA8 58B4 36D0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Oe mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
