Hi Koen, it makes me sad to see yet another message of this type by you. I was positive that by now everyone had "got over it" but now the bashing starts again :(
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 16:50 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > If you had actually read the patch you wouldn't have suggested that, > what an ugly mess to work around bugs in the familiar tree. Apart from the fact that you forgot to check in a kernel for the h4000, the diff is rather minimal. The h4000 currently requires a cvs kernel no tag exists for yet. Paul has come up with a way to make handhelds-pxa-2.6_cvs.bb fetch a kernel more recent than the CVSDATE that's used for the rest of Familiar 0.8.4. As for the other things you changed, well, we're not using a current version of bitbake (I outlined the reasons a while back) and just because certain things don't match your agenda (tune-strongarm, extra dependencies) doesn't mean they're bugs either. > I've extracted the sensical portions, cleaned them up *a lot* and > committed them. ...and once again you failed to even mention the original authors. I'd like to ask you to stop selling other people's work as your own. The h4000.conf you checked in was obviously based on Paul's patch. The rootfs_ipk.bbclass and h2200.conf changes were written by me. The commit messages probably cannot be modified after the fact, but please make sure to credit the original authors of patches you commit in the future. Thanks, Rene -- Rene Wagner rw at handhelds dot org 4F33 7FD7 93B3 166B BADA D6F8 71A1 FEA8 58B4 36D0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Oe mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
