On 7/26/06, Justin Patrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lastly, I chose virtual/x11 but virtual/libx11 would also be a good name here. If virtual/libx11 seems more right to most people I'll go ahead and switch it.
I prefer virtual/libx11, because this is a virtual provider for libx11 functionality (or the diet-x11 subset). Let's follow the example of virtual/libc virtual/libiconv virtual/libintl virtual/libsdl etc.. Does anybody think it would make sense to apply the current patches that disable xkb etc. in applications (xset, xdpyinfo, xev, xserver-kdrive) conditionally, depending on which libx11 is set as preferred provider? regards Philipp _______________________________________________ Oe mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
