On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 17:58 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 26.07.2006, 23:01 +0100 schrieb Richard Purdie:
> > On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 17:36 +0200, freyther commit wrote:
> > > --- classes/opie.bbclass 56f1af0d33515f3ce406525592cdadcec86715c4
> > > +++ classes/opie.bbclass a521ba92e8eb0138c562fa0a36a90e8998aa8f3e
> > > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> > > # Note that when CVS changes to 1.2.2, the dash
> > > # should be removed from OPIE_CVS_PV to convert
> > > # to the standardised version format
> > > -OPIE_CVS_PV = "1.2.1+cvs-${SRCDATE}"
> > > +OPIE_CVS_PV = "1.2.2+cvs-${SRCDATE}"
>
> What "standard" is this talking about anyway? :D
>
> Seriously, I can't remember we agreed on one.
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/VersioningPolicy ?
I adapted most of OE to conform to it as we had some quite strange
versions around and really needed to have some kind of standard
convention. That note was added as I didn't want to break package
upgrades but did want to standardise eventually.
Thinking of policies, I'd still like to see a preferred ordering of
variables added to the style guide on the wiki. I think you mentioned
you have an order you wanted to suggest?
Richard
_______________________________________________
Oe mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
