Discussion is just one part of decision making. Eventually a decision has to be 
made. My involvement in that issue was nothing more than it is in most cases: 
reviewing the decision and commenting on it.

-David


Chris Howe wrote:
That's very interesting, David.  Considering that
questioning of patterns is exactly what was being done
in OFBIZ-81 and you of all people prompted others to
dismiss the idea, even when the problem was
articulated.

--- "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

The best info to date on these things would be the
Framework Introduction videos and the Best Practices
Guide.

Of course, anyone who has spent enough time with
OFBiz to have commit access in a certain area should
be familiar enough with the artifacts in that area
to recognize the established patterns.

It's just like any effort to maintain consistency:
precedence is the key. Of course, precedence should
be questioned and reconsidered regularly and
sometimes even changed.

If this is a problem, it is the duty of the
community (including me and all of us on this
mailing list) to fix it, especially those who
consider it a problem.

-David


Adam Heath wrote:
David E. Jones wrote:
In general please don't be too quick to change
things, especially that
are related to established patterns. Many of
these were established
after years of feedback and trying different
things and there are
always trade-offs with such things that one must
watch out for.
Ok, so what are the established patterns?  Are
they documented anywhere?
 If no one knows them, then expect to have more of
this in the future.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to