From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Okay, I think I see what you are saying. I'm not sure if I like the > change though... If we do it for field-to-field we would really need > to do it for field-to-env, env-to-field, and env-to-env. My hope for > those fields is to get them totally removed from the simple-method > language. They are already "deprecated" and you'll get log warnings > if you use them. They are really old and stem from the days before > the FlexibleStringExpander and FlexibleMapAccessor were implemented. In this spirit it may me good that everybody seing these deprecated warning change these calls for set calls. This will clear the log a littlle bit TIA Jacques > I may be missing something though... If there is a reason I'm missing > why we really can't let this dead dog lie, please let me know. > > -David > > > On Jul 27, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Si Chen wrote: > > > The particular issue is marked as resolved by re-writing the > > service in question, but the patch for field-to-field typecasting > > was never put back into minilang, so other services would break. > > > > Si > > > > > > On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:29 PM, David E Jones wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Si Chen wrote: > >> > >>> On the issue of stability: > >>> > >>> 1. I propose that we put this http://jira.undersunconsulting.com/ > >>> browse/OFBIZ-500 back into the main code base. It addressed a > >>> typecast issue with field-to-field. > >> > >> I just took a look at this issue and it seems to be closed and > >> acknowledged as resolved. Is there something I'm missing? > >> > >> -David > >
