Chris, Does a "roadmap" focus development, or discourage those who want to contribute something different?
Can a roadmap really be adhered to given the motivations/funding strategies of most of the committers? If it was very generalised it may work, but on the other hand, very general ideas can be expressed via the mailing list. Also, is an ambitious (probably unachievable) roadmap better for morale and market perception than an unambitious (easily achievable) one? How do you gauge what is "ambitious" for an opensource project? Ok, so an email full of questions, I think it would be fascinating to know some experiences with this type of thing! - Andrew On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 02:35 -0700, Chris Howe wrote: > That's great nes on the RC1 stuff! With all of the > JIRA notifications and a lot of the good ideas that > are being transfered over to Apache/put to pasture > because lack of resources and interest, I wonder if > it's about time to discuss a roadmap of > features/methodologies/concepts/goals for future > releases. > > Also what medium that discussion should take place in. > (personally think the mailing list is a bit > restrictive for the kinds of broader discussions that > would be taking place, JIRA with subtasks seems more > appropriate but would like feedback) -- Kind Regards Andrew Sykes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sykes Development Ltd http://www.sykesdevelopment.com
