Hi Chris, From: "Chris Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > All three of those are copmletely discoverable without > an explicit status. I agree, I propose to dicover them prior to create the orders list.or when finding orders and then to set the status before showing screen.
> Although POs with rejected items, AFAIK, would never > leave that status because even if all quantity on a > line item is rejected, that order item sequence will > be "complete" You may have orders with rejected items yet in "Approved" status. > What would be the benefit of explicitly changing its > status? The idea is to distinguish them in orders list and everywhere status is used for this goal. Thanks for comments Jacques > --- Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I need to identify Purchase Order with "Inventory > > Problems", namely > > 1. Partially Received POs > > 2. POs open past their ETA > > 3. POs with rejected items > > > > I propose to add a new status "Pending" between > > "Approved" and "Competed" to cover all this cases. > > For the moment this status would be only used in > > "find orders" and "list of orders" screens and does > > not need to be updated elsewhere by event mechanisms > > which would be ressources consuming because time is > > implied here by state 2. I'm not sure yet if the 3 > > cases above will have to differentiate further. > > > > What do you think ? > > > > Jacques > >
