[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149?page=comments#action_12443839 ] 
            
Chris Howe commented on OFBIZ-149:
----------------------------------

No.  I have this working quite nicely in our company's installation, I just 
need to find the time to seperate it into it's own patch and add the 
constraints that will allow constraining the number of times a roleTypeId can 
be associated.

> Better describe complex party relationships
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-149
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149
>             Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: party
>            Reporter: Chris Howe
>         Assigned To: David E. Jones
>         Attachments: necessaryChangeLog.txt, PartyRelationship.patch
>
>
> Change to the party data model to support relationships where parties act in 
> several capacities (roles) and allowing polynary relationships. 
> If someone could describe a situation where the direcition of the role 
> matters (partyIdTo/partyIdFrom) and  where the roleType is insuficient to 
> understand the direction I will try to come up with a solution.  I'm trying 
> to understand if simply better role designations would alleviate ambiguity or 
> if there is a real need to support direction.
> I began a discussion on this topic, there has yet to be any response
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ofbiz-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
>  PROTECTED]

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to