David E Jones wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2006, at 2:23 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >> While on this topic before we get into a vote or anything, does anyone >> have any objections to requiring Java 1.4 for OFBiz? > > Whoops... I meant: requiring Java 1.5 for OFBiz? (and making it so it > won't run on Java 1.4)
Well, it depends on which features one plans on using. If possible, try on 1.4. There are some tool sets that provide 1.5 like features, but can work on a 1.4 vm. One that I am familiar with is the util.concurrent stuff, replacing java.util.concurrent.
