I got your joke, but I don't mean for it to go in specialpurpose as I don't see specialpurpose's purpose as a sandbox. Specialpurpose is definately an area that we would want to see mature applications remain and not simply be stepping stone to some sort of graduation. I meant it to illustrate creating another folder outside of applications and framework that we're all accustomed.
--- Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I'm a bit disappointed that you see specialpurpose > (and hence POS in it) as sandbox ;o) > > But yes I agree this certainly a secure open way to > go with Ajax... > > Jacques > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 6:36 AM > Subject: Ajax Sandbox > > > > Since we seem to have a pretty good eagerness as a > > community to get some Ajax examples into the > project > > but have concerns about standardized > implementations > > and I would hope a high standard of complete > > functionality (ie degrading and debugged) before > > replacing current screen functionality, might I > > suggest a sort of sandbox folder similar to > > specialpurpose? I think this would allow us to > > collaborate a lot better where we can contribute > > something that shows a direction or a > > half-implementation or proof of concept of some of > > these technologies but also benefit from SVN. > > > > I feel most of any elaborate use of ajax in an > > application is going to be monkey see, monkey do. > > This sandbox would help take some burden off those > in > > the community that have the skills to get an > > implementation going and put it on to those that > also > > want to see ajax use but whose skills are limited > to > > following a pattern. > > > > This would also allow us to vote on when certain > > implementations are mature enough to enhance the > > functionality in the core applications. If we > > followed the approach in FAQ 21 > > > http://ofbizwiki.go-integral.com/Wiki.jsp?page=FAQ21 > > the transition back into the original application > > would be pretty smoothe as well as be able to demo > how > > its role inside the original app. >
