[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-562?page=comments#action_12460721 ] 
            
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-562:
--------------------------------------

Thanks for the additional information.

It seems to me the current model supports all of those things just fine.

> Generic Item Schema Review
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-562
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-562
>             Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: product
>            Reporter: Chris Howe
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: entitymodel.xml
>
>
> The current data model treats inventory item and fixed asset as if they have 
> nothing in common.  And because there is nothing generic binding the physical 
> item they have even been separated into the notion that the fixed asset 
> physical item is dependent on accounting and the physical inventory item is 
> dependent on product.  There is a bit of confusion because of the naming of 
> the entities. 
> Of course fixed asset is an accounting term, however I believe the accounting 
> data model has overstepped it's role on the physical item.  Applications that 
> have to do with accounting should have no concern on whether the fixed asset 
> was moved from storage area A to facility B, as long as ownership hasn't 
> changed.  Likewise accounting shouldn't be concerned on when the last time 
> the item classified as a fixed asset was washed or serviced (however it 
> should be concerned with the charges for those washings and services)  In 
> business these departments that take care of these things are different.  The 
> dock workers care about what isle the item is stored at; the maintenance 
> department cares about the servicing of the equipment; the bean counter is 
> only concerned about the depreciation of the item and the receipts.  
> Because the physical item classified as the fixed asset is an accounting data 
> schema, the product entity depends on accounting.  This should not be.  
> Because the physical item is in the accounting schema, manufacturing is now 
> dependent on accounting.  This also, should not be.  This model prevents 
> Apache OFBiz from supporting the rental of items as well as modularization.  
> Both are features that would greatly enhance the value of Apache OFBiz.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to