Hi David,

I was looking for the code section doing multiple services transaction. I found 
and understood quite well the "one" service transactions.

Thanks,
Regards,
Cédric

-----Message d'origine-----
De : David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : mardi 26 décembre 2006 19:39
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: Multibple services Transaction


If you're new to OFBiz I highly recommend reviewing the Framework Introduction 
material here:

http://incubator.apache.org/ofbiz/VideosFrameworkIntro.html

In general there are various attributes on a service definition for controlling 
a transaction. By default if any service or other code is called synchronously 
it will be part of the same transaction. This is natural because of the way JTA 
works (reviewing JTA may be helpful, there is some general JTA and other J2EE 
stuff along with complete coverage of transaction handling in the Advanced 
Framework materials from Undersun).

-David


On Dec 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, PRONZATO Cedric RD-BIZZ-GRE wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I overcome to this question. Can anyone tell me where I have to look 
> to?
>
> Thanks,
> Regards,
> Cédric
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : PRONZATO Cedric RD-BIZZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> ftgroup.com] Envoyé : mercredi 20 décembre 2006 15:18 À : 
> [email protected] Objet : Multibple services Transaction
>
> Hi OFBiz community,
>
> I am reading OFBiz code to look what is going on inside and I am 
> currently looking the Transaction handling. I read somewhere that 
> there Transaction may run throw multiple services, I guess it is the 
> aim of groups*.xml but I didn't found where it is in the code.
> The ServiceDispatcher class seems to bu used to invoke a service and I 
> don't see anything in GroupModel class about Transactions.
> The GroupModel class runs services one after one without "additional 
> logic".
> Could you tell me which class is handling multiple services 
> Transaction? (I guess it exists, I don't think I dreamed about it)
>
> Thanks,
> Regards,
> Cédric
>
> PS: I am also new =)
>
>

Reply via email to