12. SVN - Eclipse wins for having a plugin

Regards,
Vinay Agarwal


-----Original Message-----
From: Vinay Agarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 9:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Netbeans vs Eclipse

Walter,

Here are some task based comparisons:

1.       Java - NB wins for better coding support

2.       XML - Eclipse wins for XSD support

3.       FTL - Eclipse wins for having a plugin

4.       BSH - NB wins for better plugin

5.       Search - Both pretty good, NB has better preview, Eclipse has
better way to restrict search for faster results

6.       Performance - About the same, both slower than I like

7.       Code printing - Both poor, I use PSPad

8.       Column select (you will know when you need it) - Neither has
support, I use PSPad

9.       Screen display - Eclipse wins for using native engine (on Windows),
NB comes close with JDK 1.6 (Mustang) 

10.   Bugs - Both have plenty

11.   OFBiz specific support - Neither has it

 

You can probably tell that I use both simultaneously.

Regards,

Vinay Agarwal

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Netbeans vs Eclipse

 

Walter,

 

IMHO rather a Ford vs. Chevy issue. Short answer : Netbeans is easier to use
but has less functionnalities (plugins mainly, for FTL & BSH for example).
It depends if you really need all that Eclipse has to offer...

 

Jacques

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Walter Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <[email protected]>

Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:01 PM

Subject: Netbeans vs Eclipse

 

 

> I've noticed in many of the tutorials Si and/or David use Eclipse 
> instead
of

> Netbeans. Since we are just getting started, is there a reason to use 
> one
over

> the other? I only ask because I downloaded a recent j2sdk1.5 and it 
> came
with

> netbeans, as well as tomcat, etc...

> 

> Is it a Ford vs. Chevy issue, or rather Audi vs. Yugo?

> 

> Thanks

> 

> --

> Walter

 

Reply via email to