I believe that was the Idea behind UML (unified Modeling Language) http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/uml.htm It really never got accepted. .
I think this aims to be much more specific than UML, which is used for all kinds of things. It describes services, and how they interact, rather than database tables or objects, or other low level things of that nature. Perhaps it has a shot at working if it doesn't try to be everything to everyone. Some healthy skepticism is in order, but the idea is interesting. I would love to offload the design of these processes to my boss, and let a computer worry about translating them into something runnable (rather than sitting down and doing it myself:-). But perhaps that's just a dream, and in reality the system doesn't work out that well, or requires an army of people to implement. Anyway, just sort of curious what others thought. -- David N. Welton - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Linux, Open Source Consulting - http://www.dedasys.com/
