Thanks Vinay! Saved me from testing it out myself :)
I'm always looking for ways to limit the kinds of
hammers I keep around when all I have actually are
nails (always looking to butcher metaphors as well)
--- Vinay Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have extensively used "UtilMisc.toMap(new Object[]
> {key1, val1, key2,
> val2, ...})" version of the function to create maps
> with large number of
> parameters. It works well.
>
> Regards,
> Vinay Agarwal
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Howe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: UtilMisc.toMap wierdness
>
> actually, it does already. the 7th toMap method
> accepts an even object
> array and returns the map. I would test it though.
> It looks to skip the
> Object[0].
>
>
> --- Walter Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >
> > > This is due to Java limitation in arguments
> > number. You may create your own toMap() method in
> UtilMisc.Java...
> >
> > Thanks everyone...
> >
> > As complete newbies in "OFBiz think" it seemed
> impossible that there
> > was a hard coded upper limit. Of course two of the
> guys want to
> > rewrite it so that it would accept 1 to infinity-1
> number of
> > arguments.
> >
> > We'll save that for an other day...
> >
> > --
> > Walter
> >
>
>
>
