Hello everybody I have recently found these two entities, WorkEffortFixedAssetAssign and WorkEffortFixedAssetStd, and was wondering if anyone had some information on them, such as their purpose and how are they meant to be used, because they might be what I'm looking for to implement the feature I described. So, any thoughts? Thanks in advance. Regards,
-- Ricardo Chavez On 9/29/06, Ricardo Chavez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jacopo Thanks for the reply. Posting the JIRA feature request right now... -- Ricardo Chavez On 9/28/06, Jacopo Cappellato < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Ricardo, > > there are no plans (that I'm aware of) of implementing this feature so > please post a Jira feature request because others could be interested in > helping you with this. > > This could be implemented in different ways: > > a) expanding the concept of FixedAsset groups (so that the data model > will > be left mostly unchanged); you create a fixed asset of type group (e.g. > "sewing machines of room A") and this fixed asset is associated to the > task; then you link each sewing machine (other fixed assets) to the > fixed > asset group > > b) (more complex) add new association entities to link a task > (WorkEffort) > to one or more machines (FixedAsset). > > If possible I'd follow the a) path... but I don't know what your > requirements are so this is just a 1 cent opinion. > > Jacopo > > Ricardo Chavez wrote: > > Hello everybody. I have this doubt about production run tasks and > machines. > > Is there a way to associate more than one machine (fixed asset) to a > single > > production run task? That would cover the case when you have many > machines > > working on the same production task, which I think is quite common in > any > > manufacturing business (e.g. many sewing machines working to complete > a > > production run of 1000 T-shirts). > > If this cannot be done yet, are there any plans to implement it? I can > post > > a JIRA feature request for this (unless, of course, you think it's not > a > > necessary feature and it needs not to be implemented) > > Thanks in advance for your answer. > > Regards, > > > > -- Ricardo Chavez > > > > >
