Is springframework a problem?

I could switch out hibernate to something else, since most of the fun is in lucene.

Do you understand what authsum could bring to ofbiz? It could tell you what customers you can place an order on behalf of in a split second.


Phillip
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: Authorization and SSO server for ofbiz offer


Phillip,

Just about licence : only Hibernate is really a problem since it's LGPL licenced

BTW you may consider using Entity Engine in place of Hibernate/Spring/Tapestry because I can't see how all that would fit in OFBiz
:o)

It's up to you...

Jacques

----- Original Message ----- From: "Phillip Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:57 AM
Subject: Authorization and SSO server for ofbiz offer


Hi,
My name is Phillip Rhodes, and I have been a java developer since '96,
and have integrated apps with Oracle 11i ERP systems, Tibco, Vertex, sso
and all kinds of interesting projects...

I have a project called "authsum" , think of it as "sum of authorizations"
http://www.authsum.org/

Good summary architecture diagram:
http://www.authsum.org/overview/index.html

In summary, it's a SSO/Identity server.  It communicates with client
applications via a JDBC or Web services api to figure out what
authorizations a user has.  The authorizations are stored in a lucene
index, so it's fast (given how enterprises can have complicated
group/role structures).

Anyway, just wanted to know if it would be possible to bolt this into
ofbiz.  I would be willing to give the authsum code the same license
(apache).  Unfortunately, it uses hibernate/spring/tapestry (open source
products) .

It would also "complicate things" because it consists of 4 different
webapps that can be run in a distributed environment.  But it also has a
SSO so that it could provide SSO across ofbiz/registration/user
admin/CMS/etc...

Just putting a feeler out.
Phillip




Reply via email to