On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Andrew Ballantine wrote:

I think what David is saying is the OFBiz open source project can only
support and develop the framework in the direction that the major
contributors wish to go. And I fully understand that.

...
Some of you have commented that you would not like to see a fork and I most
definitely agree. There is no technical requirement for a fork. What I
envisage is a sub-project that works on the usability, presentation, sample
data, OOTB functionality and installability issues that we have been
discussing. The under-lying framework would be OFBiz. If different vertical markets require different procedures within the framework, then I would suggest that conditional code in the framework be used to handle different
"Flavours" of use. The advantage of this is that anyone modifying the
Framework code can see what effect their changes might have on a different
flavour of the framework.

Some obvious flavours might be:
USA accounting and taxation
EU accounting and VAT with various country flavours
Manufacturing
Direct Sales
Retail shop
eCommerce
...
These flavours would be set at install time in the configuration files, but
interpreted at run time.

Much of this functionality, as you've noted, is available out of the box. To get it running how you need or want takes a bit of effort because the options are rather granular.

A lot these OOTB flavours, or "industry specific configurations" could certainly be part of OFBiz. The best mechanism for this is probably to create flavour-specific data file that would sit on top of the basic seed data files. The one to use can be selected when you are setting up your database, and once OFBiz is running you could have a pre-configured company, sample products, and so on waiting for your personalization, but specific to your industry as opposed to bering very generic like the current demo data is.

-David

Reply via email to