Hello


All right. I am fairly available this month so I do not mind. Please add me to the list.

Then before next summer (so basically Wikimania roughly ?), we need to figure out report+contacts+members

Flo


Le 13/03/2019 à 17:59, Samuel Klein a écrit :
Gabe: great first logo!  Let's use it.

Florence: I do not have access to the chapter wiki.  We were just all added to a mailing list, and invited to appoint 2 people from each user group to join the list.  Then I believe the list will together come up with a proposed mechanism for nomination, which will be reviewed by the WMF Board within 2 weeks.  Would you like to be added to that list?

I will forward the last email on the topic that I've gotten.  I am willing to be the other person from WOW, but this is a busy month so I would also be glad to see another person step up.

Warmly, SJ


On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:15 AM Florence Devouard <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hello

    Le 04/03/2019 à 20:30, Samuel Klein a écrit :
    For group contacts + reports :  It would be good to have an
    annual nomination thread, and short wiki vote, a few months
    before our annual report? (/August/ each year)

    Ok. So we could put that back on the table around May ?


    That way we can use the same energy to summarize what's been
    happening; those involved in active projects should feel welcome
    to be liaisons; and we keep the meta pages up to date.

    On board voting:

    For information, the signpost (well, Bluerasberry) has published
    this that is worth reading:

    
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2019-02-28/In_focus


    + Arranging private votes has been a perennial weakness for the
    movement.  Would others be interested in public discussion of
    pros/cons of different candidates?

    For information :
    https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliate-selected_Board_seats

    Ok, vote is one thing. Nomination is another.

    So to start with, I am not sure what is currently the process for
    nominating candidates...
    Apparently, voting takes care on the ChapterWiki, which is a
    private wiki (I suppose that Sam has access to it... do you Sam ?)
    I presume that nomination process also takes place on the
    ChapterWiki ? Can you tell us if that is the case Sam ?


    + I respect the concerns around voting multiple times: we want
    people to be comfortable joining many groups while only voting
    once.  Is there any proposal yet re: how to do this?
    Unclear

    + Say that, per Nemo, only incorporated groups vote in the final
    selection.  Perhaps we could share formal recommendations with
    that group, before their vote (and sort those out on Meta).


    As said previously, ALL groups can vote. It is not restricted to
    incorporated groups.
    But indeed, we can also simply choose to NOT vote. But if so, this
    is something we should explicitely decide.

    I vaguely feel that what we should do is
    1) participate in the nomination process (IF we have a name to
    propose and IF it is not in the current list - if list there is...
    so first thing would be to figure out where the nomination list
    would actually be...)
    2) not participate in the vote (because it is unclear who our
    membership is and it is likely many of us are in other groups)

    What about starting by polling our "members" on a wiki page about
    how they feel about the offline group actually trying to vote for
    someone ?


    Florence



    SJ

    On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 9:39 AM Federico Leva (Nemo)
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Thanks for raising the point.

        Florence Devouard, 27/02/19 14:17:
        > Yet... an WMF affiliate has some obligations... so how
        should we deal
        > with that in the least time-consuming, least-bureaucratic,
        > least-expensive way, yet playing our role in representing,
        recruting and
        > promoting offline in the mouvement ?

         From my point of view as a supporter of offline projects,
        the ideal
        solution is that all affiliates agree that only incorporated
        entities
        will have a formal vote (whatever its weight) in the final
        phase of the
        selection of 2 board seats, to avoid creating new unwanted
        work about
        internal governance.

        Alternatively, a simple method might be to decide that all
        user groups
        will have a discussion/vote on a certain wiki page where all
        their
        members can join (Meta-Wiki may be enough if it can be
        public), so that
        it's easy to identify unwanted patterns. (And establish a
        quorum or
        whatever other criteria is decided.)

        Federico

        _______________________________________________
        Offline-l mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/offline-l



-- Samuel Klein          @metasj           w:user:sj          +1 617
    529 4266



--
Samuel Klein          @metasj           w:user:sj          +1 617 529 4266
_______________________________________________
Offline-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/offline-l

Reply via email to