Florence - yes, I see that. Emmanuel - No need to spend much time on this process; but a quick filling out of the survey indicating dissatisfaction with every option will help close off this possibility for creative use of statistics.
For those who do want to discuss this briefly w/ other affiliates (rather than w/ staff), see my following message. Warmly, S On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:24 AM Emmanuel Engelhart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Florence > > Thank you for keeping us up-to-date with this process. > > On 17.06.20 20:08, Florence Devouard wrote: > > So, the Brand Team is moving on and has announced a short list of > > proposals to rename Wikimedia Foundation, UG and such to remove the word > > "Wikimedia" > > I hope I'm properly informed, but AFAIK there is an extremely strong > majority (almost a consensus) within the community against replacing > "Wikimedia" with "Wikipedia" in our orgs naming. cf. > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia > > But it seems that the process continues without taking in account the > result of this survey. To me, this seems not fair. > > Considering that offline activities are booming, in particular because > of the Covid19 pandemic and therefore we have a lot to do anyway, I > wonder why exactly I should invest more time on this process?! > > Regards > Emmanuel > > -- > Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline & more > * Web: https://kiwix.org/ > * Twitter: https://twitter.com/KiwixOffline > * Wiki: https://wiki.kiwix.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Offline-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/offline-l > -- Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266
_______________________________________________ Offline-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/offline-l
