Well received, thank you. Just one last concept I can't get. If I perform a nametrans from A to B, don't I need to always set an inverse nametrans on the second account? Otherwise I would expect a loop. Thank you again Il 11 mag 2016 7:10 PM, "Nicolas Sebrecht" <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:22:35PM +0200, 101passi wrote: > > > Dear Nicolas, sorry for missing the cc to the mailing list. > > I assumed that two ends can be a "non local" maildir according to > > this [1]http://www.offlineimap.org/doc/use_cases.html part of the > > documentation > > "Sync from GMail to another IMAP server" > > and also here [2]http://www.offlineimap.org/doc/features.html > > "With OfflineIMAP 4.0, a powerful new ability has been introduced ― > the > > program can now synchronize two IMAP servers with each other, with no > need > > to have a Maildir layer in-between" > > I am willing to test the behaviour and proceed carefully. Would you > please > > be so kind to point me in the right direction about NAMETRANS for > gmail > > and traditional IMAP servers (for nesting purpose?). > > Offlineimap supports IMAP/IMAP sync but nametrans is for tuning local > maildir only. IMAP/IMAP mode assumes full sync of the filtered folders > with no way to tune the layers. > > > To be true there > is > > nothing around which is comparable to offlineIMAP as an alternative.. > > There is MBSync but I'm not sure it supports the feature you expect. > I'm not sure it can sync 2 IMAP servers, either. > > -- > Nicolas Sebrecht >
_______________________________________________ OfflineIMAP-project mailing list: [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/offlineimap-project OfflineIMAP homepages: - https://github.com/OfflineIMAP - http://offlineimap.org
