Thank you, Paolo! > On Oct 2, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Paolo Inaudi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know what you are talking about, and what copyleft means. For my projects, > I default to it, because I like what implies. As long as I don't receive > contributions, I can change any time. > > As I told, my initial thought wasn't about integrating into libfabric, nor I > would have expected all of you to be so eager to integrate it. There should > be no problem with changing the license now, and I will discuss with other > interested parties. > > Paolo > > Il 02/ott/2015 20:27, "Jeff Hammond" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Il 02/10/2015 19:04, Woodruff, Robert J ha scritto: >> I think he said LGPL not GPL, but the OFA prefers the dual BSD/GPL license. > I did say LGPL. > > > LGPL solves the problem for the end user who is linking the DLL, but not the > developer community, which is who you are trying to convey your code to. The > source of your code is copyleft, which infects the minds of anyone that reads > it. You probably think I am joking or exaggerating, but I am not. You > should talk to lawyers at any company that sells software. > > Jeff > > -- > Jeff Hammond > [email protected] > http://jeffhammond.github.io/ > _______________________________________________ > ofiwg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
