For now, this is being discussed in the DS/DA group, because that's where the storage people are. Once we've settled on suggested additional requirements/changes to libfabrics, it will be brought to OFIWG for further discussion. For now, it's a storage topic. -Paul
-----Original Message----- From: Hefty, Sean [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 12:36 PM To: Paul Grun <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: DS/DA Agenda for Tuesday, 6/21/16 I think it would be better to discuss this proposal during the ofiwg-"classic" meetings, rather than ds/da. I don't think we want to split libfabric API discussions into different meetings, as that just requires everyone to attend both. - Sean > -----Original Message----- > From: ofiwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Paul Grun > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 12:58 AM > To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> > Subject: [ofiwg] DS/DA Agenda for Tuesday, 6/21/16 > > Continue review of Intel's proposed extensions to libfabric for RDMA. > > Attached is an update of the document published by Chet Douglas > incorporating comments from our last meeting. > > > > Regards, > > -Paul > > > > Advanced Technology Group > > Cray, Inc. > > Office - (503) 620 - 8757 > > Mobile - (503) 703 - 5382 > > _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
