OK with me.
-----Original Message----- From: ofiwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Grun <[email protected]> Date: Monday, September 12, 2016 at 5:49 PM To: "Hefty, Sean" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [ofiwg] OFI WG - opinions sought on prioritizing agenda items for next meeting (9/20) The problem is that both topics are the fruit of a previous discussion. The question is about prioritizing which to complete first. Oh, and btw, we are in fact expecting a full report out, complete with 8x10 color glossy photographs with a paragraph on the back of each one, explaining your sabbatical. Sayantan, okay to defer the code walk through of the Collectives Offload proposal? Regards, -Paul -----Original Message----- From: Hefty, Sean [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 4:46 PM To: Paul Grun <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: OFI WG - opinions sought on prioritizing agenda items for next meeting (9/20) > Our choices are: > > 1. Defer the code walk through of the Collective Offload proposal, > or > > 2. Defer completion of the discussion of the Enhancements to RDMA > for Non-volatile memory. > > Please express your opinions, soon. I prefer to extend my sabbatical until the end of the year. Thanks for asking. If there's no conflicts, it seems better to continue the previous discussion. - Sean _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
