Ok. AFAIK, Arun's confirmation is the last item I need before posting the tarballs / etc.
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Hefty, Sean <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ok, so just to be clear: this was a bug in fabtests, and we *don't* >> have a forward incompatibility issue with the sockets provider. Right? > > correct > >> If so, are we waiting for this forward compatibility test with MXM, >> UDP, and verbs? Or releasing without their say-so? > > UDP was verified. I updated the issue, but I would ignore mxm. Arun has > likely already checked verbs, but please let him verify. > > - Sean -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
