Chris – I sent you my suggested re-wording privately last week. Please let me know if you did not receive the text. I think this version of it makes too much of the OFA (‘…an effort to promote utilization of OFI…’) and does not do enough to elaborate on the value of the extensions being suggested for investigation. The motivation for the BoF should not be about accelerating adoption of libfabric…it should be about improving application performance and/or efficiency. Regards, -Paul
From: ofiwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ct clmsn Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 12:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [ofiwg] OpenFabrics related C++ Networking Technical Specification BoF OFA/OFIWG asked for a copy of my BoF proposal to be distributed to the community for review. The link below is to a google document capturing the current state of the BoF proposal. Please add comments to the document before 26 July (Wednesday). If you have issues accessing the document, please email me. https://goo.gl/41hQ27 For those of you taking the time to review the submission, thanks in advance. V/r, Chris
_______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
